Singh (Migration)
Case
•
[2019] AATA 3084
•8 May 2019
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Singh (Migration) [2019] AATA 3084
[2019] AATA 3084
8 May 2019
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned a Regional Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class RN) visa, Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme), Direct Entry stream, for a Retail Manager (General). The applicant sought review of a decision that their nomination had not been approved. The Tribunal was required to determine whether the nomination for the position met the relevant criteria under clause 187.233 of the Migration Regulations.
The Tribunal considered the requirements of clause 187.233, which stipulated that the nominated position must be located in regional Australia, be the subject of an approved nomination, and that the nominator must be the prospective employer. Additionally, the nomination must not have been withdrawn, there must be no adverse information known to Immigration, the position must remain available, and the visa application must be lodged within six months of the nomination's approval. The Tribunal found that the position nominated was the same as that declared in the visa application and that the nominator was indeed the prospective employer.
Based on its previous findings in a related nomination application, the Tribunal concluded that the visa applicant now met the requirements of clause 187.233. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the visa application to the Minister for reconsideration of the remaining visa criteria, with a direction that the applicant satisfied clause 187.233.
The Tribunal considered the requirements of clause 187.233, which stipulated that the nominated position must be located in regional Australia, be the subject of an approved nomination, and that the nominator must be the prospective employer. Additionally, the nomination must not have been withdrawn, there must be no adverse information known to Immigration, the position must remain available, and the visa application must be lodged within six months of the nomination's approval. The Tribunal found that the position nominated was the same as that declared in the visa application and that the nominator was indeed the prospective employer.
Based on its previous findings in a related nomination application, the Tribunal concluded that the visa applicant now met the requirements of clause 187.233. Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the visa application to the Minister for reconsideration of the remaining visa criteria, with a direction that the applicant satisfied clause 187.233.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
-
Statutory Construction
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Singh (Migration) [2019] AATA 3084
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0