| [2015] FWCA 3404 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Singapore Airlines Limited
(AG2015/2355)
SINGAPORE AIRLINES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Airline operations | |
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 19 MAY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Singapore Airlines Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Singapore Airlines Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Singapore Airlines Limited (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 2 April 2015. The application included a Statutory Declaration of Kieran James O’Toole made on behalf of the Employer and dated 2 April 2015 (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 23 March 2015. Therefore the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by subsection 185 (3) of the Act.
[3] The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) identified various issues relating to aspects of the application including the contents of certain terms contained in the Agreement, which required clarification. The Employer was advised of these concerns and invited to provide a response.
[4] The Commission has received correspondence dated 14 May 2015, from AI Group acting on behalf of the Employer, which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Employer, and proposed to the Commission pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[5] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Commission can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have reviewed the contents of the Declaration, the further material in support of the application and the Undertakings. As a result of the consideration of these materials I am satisfied that, inter alia, the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met.
[6] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the Commission on 19 May 2015. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of David Smith made on behalf of the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (the ASU), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.
[7] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 8 and a consultation term at clause 9.
[8] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[9] The ASU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201 (2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the ASU.
[10] The Agreement as varied by the Undertakings is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 26 May 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement as specified in clause 7.1 of the Agreement, is 31 March 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE413991 PR567518>
- AGLC
- Singapore Airlines Limited [2015] FWCA 3404
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3404
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed agreement complied with the statutory requirements for approval, including whether it provided for a single industrial instrument and whether it included appropriate mechanisms for resolving disputes. The Commission had to consider the provisions of the agreement in light of the relevant sections of the Fair Work Act, including section 234 and section 228, which deals with the content of an enterprise agreement.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement met the statutory criteria for approval. It provided for a single industrial instrument, covering all employees of Singapore Airlines, and included provisions for the resolution of disputes, including a mechanism for conciliation and arbitration. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement included appropriate protections for employees and that it was fair and reasonable in all its terms. The Commission approved the Singapore Airlines Enterprise Agreement 2015, and it came into effect on 1 July 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.