| [2019] FWCA 317 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Simplot Australia Pty Limited T/A Simplot Australia
(AG2018/5602)
SIMPLOT AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED AND AMWU AND CEPU ECHUCA ENTERPRISE BARGAINING AGREEMENT 2018
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
COMMISSIONER LEE | MELBOURNE, 21 JANUARY 2019 |
Application for approval of the Simplot Australia Pty Limited and AMWU and CEPU Echuca Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Simplot Australia Pty Limited and AMWU and CEPU Echuca Enterprise Bargaining Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Simplot Australia Pty Limited T/A Simplot Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) being a bargaining representatives for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 28 January 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2021.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE501381 PR703982>
- AGLC
- Simplot Australia Pty Limited T/A Simplot Australia [2019] FWCA 317
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 317
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court's approval of the enterprise bargaining agreement was based on its finding that the agreement met all legal requirements and was fair and reasonable. The court considered the evidence presented regarding the negotiation process, the scope of the agreement, and the terms and conditions it contained. The court was satisfied that the agreement was negotiated in good faith, and that all mandatory provisions were included. The court also found that the terms of the agreement were fair and reasonable, taking into account the economic circumstances and the needs of the employees and employer. The court concluded that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and approved it accordingly.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.