Simons and Simons (No. 2)

In *Simons and Simons (No. 2)*, the applicant sought an order for costs against the respondent. The specific nature of the underlying dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text, nor is the court in which the application was heard, beyond the presiding judge being Justice Rose.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had established sufficient grounds to warrant an order for costs against the respondent. This required the court to consider the relevant legal principles governing the award of costs in such proceedings.

Justice Rose dismissed the applicant's application for costs. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant failed to persuade the court to exercise its discretion in their favour regarding the recovery of costs.