Silke and Silke and Ors

In *Silke and Silke and Ors*, heard by Mead J, the applicants sought interim orders against the first, second, and third respondents. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that the second and third respondents filed an amended response on 19 July 2019, seeking certain interim orders themselves.

The central legal issue before the court was whether to grant the interim orders sought by the second and third respondents in their amended response. The court was required to consider the merits of these applications and determine whether they should be dismissed.

Mead J ordered the dismissal of paragraphs 1 and 2 of the interim orders sought by the second and third respondents. The reasoning behind this decision is not elaborated upon in the provided extract, but the outcome clearly indicates that the court found insufficient grounds to grant those specific interim measures.