| [2024] FWCA 3158 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Silk Contract Logistics Pty Ltd T/A Silk Contract Logistics Pty Ltd
(AG2024/3057)
SILK CONTRACT LOGISTICS PTY LTD BRISBANE PORT LOGISTICS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024
| Road transport industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON | BRISBANE, 30 AUGUST 2024 |
Application for approval of the Silk Contract Logistics Pty LtdBrisbane Port Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Silk Contract Logistics Pty Ltd Brisbane Port Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Silk Contract Logistics Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]
The Agreement does not contain a delegates rights term that is no less favourable than the modern award, pursuant to s.205A, and on that basis the term in the relevant modern award will apply and the delegates’ rights term in the Agreement at clause 9.1 will have no effect.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.
Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):
· Clause 4.3.2 – Notice of personal leave
· Clause 4.4 – Compassionate leave
· Clause 5.2.4 – Casual Conversion
· Clause 6.1.2 – Withholding of NES entitlements
· Clause 6.2 – Abandonment.
· Clause 6.3.1 – Redundancy Pay
However, noting clause 1.1.5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the TWU.
The TWU raised concerns regarding the Better Off Overall Test (BOOT). I have considered these submissions but have determined that given the more beneficial terms of the Agreement and the undertakings given, the Agreement passed the BOOT.
The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 10 August 2027.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].
[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE525963 PR778795>
- AGLC
- Silk Contract Logistics Pty Ltd T/A Silk Contract Logistics Pty Ltd [2024] FWCA 3158
- Case
- [2024] FWCA 3158
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the enterprise agreement complied with the necessary legal standards and provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved examining the agreement's provisions against relevant legislative criteria, including whether it contained all mandatory terms and conditions, whether it was made in good faith, and whether it provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement had been appropriately certified and whether it met the requirements for approval.
The Fair Work Commission meticulously reviewed the provisions of the enterprise agreement and the certification process. The Commission found that the agreement contained all mandatory terms and conditions, and it was made in good faith. The agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, aligning with the statutory requirements. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement had been appropriately certified and met all necessary criteria for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the Commission approved the Brisbane Port Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2024.
The Commission's final order was the approval of the Brisbane Port Logistics Enterprise Agreement 2024, effective from the date of the decision. The agreement was to be registered with the Fair Work Commission and would govern the employment terms and conditions of the employees covered by the agreement, subject to any future variations or amendments as per the legal process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.