| [2017] FWCA 5853 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
Silcar Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4868)
SILCAR COMMUNICATIONS AND CEPU UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Telecommunications services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 8 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Application for termination of the Silcar Communications and CEPU Union Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] On 16 October 2017, Silcar Pty Ltd applied for the termination of the Silcar Communications and CEPU Union Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement) under s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.222 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.223 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from 6 December 2017.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE892125 PR597550>
- AGLC
- Silcar Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 5853
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5853
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the evidence presented by both parties regarding the changes in the industry, technological advancements, and the economic context to determine if these changes were significant enough to warrant the termination of the agreement. It was noted that the union argued the changes did not justify termination, while the company contended that the changes had fundamentally altered the nature of the workforce and the business operations, necessitating a new agreement.
After considering the evidence and arguments, the court concluded that the changes were indeed significant and justified the termination of the existing agreement. The court found that the company had met the statutory criteria for termination, and accordingly, the Silcar Communications and CEPU Union Enterprise Agreement 2012 was terminated. The decision allowed the parties to negotiate a new agreement that better reflected the current economic and operational realities.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.