Shovelton and Shovelton (Child support)
Case
•
[2021] AATA 4785
•26 October 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shovelton and Shovelton (Child support) [2021] AATA 4785
[2021] AATA 4785
26 October 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The matter of *Shovelton and Shovelton* concerned an application for a departure determination under the *Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988* (Cth). The applicant sought to vary an existing child support assessment, arguing that certain costs were not adequately accounted for. The decision was made by M Douglas M.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the costs associated with the children's education, specifically orthodontic expenses, constituted a significant change in the costs of maintaining the children, thereby establishing a ground for departure from the standard child support assessment. The court was required to determine if these expenses were incurred in a manner expected by both parents and if it would be just and equitable to depart from the assessment.
The court found that the orthodontic expenses were a significant cost of maintaining the children and that these expenses were incurred in a manner that both parents would have expected. Consequently, the court determined that a ground for departure was established and that it was just and equitable to depart from the assessment. The decision under review was therefore varied.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the costs associated with the children's education, specifically orthodontic expenses, constituted a significant change in the costs of maintaining the children, thereby establishing a ground for departure from the standard child support assessment. The court was required to determine if these expenses were incurred in a manner expected by both parents and if it would be just and equitable to depart from the assessment.
The court found that the orthodontic expenses were a significant cost of maintaining the children and that these expenses were incurred in a manner that both parents would have expected. Consequently, the court determined that a ground for departure was established and that it was just and equitable to depart from the assessment. The decision under review was therefore varied.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Jurisdiction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0