Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (Queensland Branch) Union of Employees v Woolworths Limited T/A Woolworths
Case
•
[2013] FWCFB 2814
•17 MAY 2013
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (Queensland Branch) Union of Employees v Woolworths Limited T/A Woolworths [2013] FWCFB 2814
[2013] FWCFB 2814
17 MAY 2013
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The parties involved in this matter are the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (Queensland Branch) Union of Employees and Woolworths Limited trading as Woolworths. The dispute centres around the interpretation and application of a collective agreement, specifically the National Retail Award 2010, in relation to the payment of penalty rates for certain employees. This case was heard in the Fair Work Commission, and the appeal was against a decision made by Commissioner Bissett on 19 March 2013 in matter number C2012/3322.
The primary legal issues that the court had to decide involved the classification of certain employees under the National Retail Award 2010 and the application of penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work. The Union argued that certain employees were entitled to penalty rates for work on weekends and public holidays, while Woolworths contended that these employees were exempt from such penalty rates due to their classification and the specific terms of the award. The court was tasked with interpreting the award to determine whether the employees were indeed exempt from penalty rates.
The court's reasoning focused on the precise wording of the National Retail Award 2010 and its application to the specific circumstances of the employees in question. The court examined the award's definition of "shop employee" and the conditions under which penalty rates applied. It found that the employees in question were indeed classified as "shop employees" and were not exempt from penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the original decision of Commissioner Bissett was upheld.
No additional orders were made by the court beyond upholding the original decision. The final outcome was that the employees in question were entitled to the penalty rates specified in the National Retail Award 2010 for work performed on weekends and public holidays.
The primary legal issues that the court had to decide involved the classification of certain employees under the National Retail Award 2010 and the application of penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work. The Union argued that certain employees were entitled to penalty rates for work on weekends and public holidays, while Woolworths contended that these employees were exempt from such penalty rates due to their classification and the specific terms of the award. The court was tasked with interpreting the award to determine whether the employees were indeed exempt from penalty rates.
The court's reasoning focused on the precise wording of the National Retail Award 2010 and its application to the specific circumstances of the employees in question. The court examined the award's definition of "shop employee" and the conditions under which penalty rates applied. It found that the employees in question were indeed classified as "shop employees" and were not exempt from penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the original decision of Commissioner Bissett was upheld.
No additional orders were made by the court beyond upholding the original decision. The final outcome was that the employees in question were entitled to the penalty rates specified in the National Retail Award 2010 for work performed on weekends and public holidays.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Employment & Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Unjust Dismissal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
National Tertiary Education Industry Union v Flinders University of South Australia [2025] FWCFB 62
Cases Citing This Decision
136
Ausgrid Pty Ltd t/as Ausgrid v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
[2025] FWCFB 183
United Firefighters' Union of Australia v Fire Rescue Victoria
[2025] FWCFB 177
Cases Cited
11
Statutory Material Cited
0
Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (Queensland Branch) Union of Employees v Woolworths Limited T/A Woolworths
[2013] FWC 1335
Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australia Pty Ltd
[2001] HCA 70