[2013] FWCA 1973 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association
(AG2013/5758)
THORNLIE SUPA IGA AND SDA AGREEMENT 2012
Retail industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 3 APRIL 2013 |
Application for approval of the Thornlie Supa IGA and SDA Agreement 2012.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Thornlie Supa IGA and SDA Agreement 2012 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) of the Act, the Fair Work Commission extends the period for filing the application in this matter to the date on which the application was filed.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Clause 36−Introduction of Change of the Agreement does not provide for employee representatives other than the “Union” and so does not meet the requirements of s.205(1)(b) of the Act. As a consequence, pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 1 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] The Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 April 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 April 2017.
COMMISSIONER
1 Section 2.09 and Schedule 2.2 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE400555 PR535296>
- AGLC
- Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association [2013] FWCA 1973
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 1973
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether it contained the necessary bargaining provisions, as stipulated by the Act. Additionally, the Commission assessed if the agreement complied with the "better off overall test" which requires that the agreement must not disadvantage employees compared to their previous conditions.
The Fair Work Commission found that the Thornlie Supa IGA and SDA Agreement 2012 had been made in good faith and contained the necessary bargaining provisions. Furthermore, the Commission concluded that the agreement satisfied the better off overall test, as it did not disadvantage the employees. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions of employment, including provisions for wages, hours of work, and other employment-related matters. Consequently, the Commission approved the agreement under section 173 of the Fair Work Act 2009. This approval ensures that the terms and conditions set out in the agreement will apply to the employees of Thornlie Supa IGA as a legally binding enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.