Shnell & Frey (No 2)
Case
•
[2020] FamCA 846
•25 September 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shnell & Frey (No 2) [2020] FamCA 846
[2020] FamCA 846
25 September 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Shnell & Frey (No 2)*, the wife applied to the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia for a stay of the hearing of the husband's application for costs. The husband sought his costs of and incidental to final property proceedings.
The primary legal issue before Carew J was whether the wife's application for a stay of the costs hearing should be granted. A secondary issue arose concerning the husband's costs incurred in responding to the wife's stay application, given the wife's ultimate lack of success.
Carew J dismissed the wife's application for a stay. The court reasoned that there was no basis to grant a stay of the costs hearing, particularly as the wife had been wholly unsuccessful in her application. Consequently, the wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs of the stay application, which were fixed at $1,000.
The primary legal issue before Carew J was whether the wife's application for a stay of the costs hearing should be granted. A secondary issue arose concerning the husband's costs incurred in responding to the wife's stay application, given the wife's ultimate lack of success.
Carew J dismissed the wife's application for a stay. The court reasoned that there was no basis to grant a stay of the costs hearing, particularly as the wife had been wholly unsuccessful in her application. Consequently, the wife was ordered to pay the husband's costs of the stay application, which were fixed at $1,000.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Stay of Proceedings
-
Costs
-
Appeal
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Shnell & Frey (No 2) [2020] FamCA 846
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Rinehart v Rinehart
[2020] NSWSC 68
UBS AG v Tyne
[2018] HCA 45