Shirley and Moore
Case
•
[2020] FamCA 220
•8 April 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shirley and Moore [2020] FamCA 220
[2020] FamCA 220
8 April 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of Shirley and Moore, Hogan J of the Federal Court of Australia considered an application concerning costs. The specific nature of the dispute that led to the initiating application filed on 7 August 2019 is not detailed in the provided text, but the proceedings culminated in an order regarding the payment of costs by the respondent to the applicant.
The central legal issue before Hogan J was the determination of the quantum and payment terms for the costs associated with the initiating application. The court was required to fix a specific monetary amount for these costs and establish a deadline for their payment.
Hogan J ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the initiating application. These costs were fixed at $3,500.00 and were to be paid by 8 December 2020. The court noted that the final form of this order was contingent upon its entry into the Court's records.
The central legal issue before Hogan J was the determination of the quantum and payment terms for the costs associated with the initiating application. The court was required to fix a specific monetary amount for these costs and establish a deadline for their payment.
Hogan J ordered that the respondent pay the applicant's costs of and incidental to the initiating application. These costs were fixed at $3,500.00 and were to be paid by 8 December 2020. The court noted that the final form of this order was contingent upon its entry into the Court's records.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Shirley and Moore [2020] FamCA 220
Most Recent Citation
Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2) [1995] FCA 350
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Moore & Shirley (No 2)
[2022] FedCFamC1F 830
Beach Petroleum NL v Johnson (No 2)
[1995] FCA 350
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Oshlack v Richmond River Council
[1998] HCA 11
Yunghanns v Yunghanns
[2000] FamCA 681
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty ltd
[1993] FCA 801