Shepherd v Shoalhaven City council

Case [2019] NSWLEC 1351


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Shepherd v Shoalhaven City council [2019] NSWLEC 1351
Hearing dates: Conciliation conferences on 21 and 26 June 2019, 2 and 11 July 2019
Date of orders: 30 July 2019
Decision date: 30 July 2019
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Bish C
Decision:

(1) The Appeal is upheld.
(2) The Order No. 12 dated 19 September 2018 (reference ON2018/5981) given by the Respondent to the Applicant pursuant to s 124 & s 152 of the Local Government Act 1993 is revoked.

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – flood levee works – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Local Government Act 1993
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Colin Shepherd (Applicant)
Shoalhaven City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Staunton (Applicant)

  Solicitors:
John McGuire and Associates (Applicant)
S Schneider, Houtson Dearn O'Connor (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/332582
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the orders (reference ON2018/5981) made by Shoalhaven City Council (the Council) which seeks construction of a suitably sized and designed levee to control the flow of floodwaters on Lot 1 DP 871574, also known as 2 Southern Road, Terara (the site).

  2. The orders for required works on the site are made by Council, pursuant to s 124 (table order 12) of the Local Government Act 1993 (LG Act) and dated 19 September 2018.

  3. This Class 1 appeal is made under s 18(a) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). The Court is required to make a determination, pursuant to s 180(4) of the LG Act.

  4. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the LEC Act between the parties, which was initially held onsite on 21 June 2019, and thereafter resumed by telephone on 26 June, 2 July and 11 July 2019 in an attempt to resolve the contentions. I have presided over the conciliation conferences. There were no objections raised by third parties at this conciliation.

  5. Following the conciliation conferences, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision is to uphold the appeal and revoke the orders issued on 19 September 2018 by Council for levee works.

  6. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision, if it is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties' decision involves the Court exercising its function under s 34(3) to revoke the orders for levee works as specified.

  7. The parties stated that there were no jurisdictional impediments to the making of this agreement. They identified the jurisdictional prerequisites of particular relevance in these proceedings are pursuant to ss 124 and 153 of the LG Act, requiring consistency with table order 12 “ To do such things as are necessary to control the flow of surface water across land”.

  8. Council have made a separate binding agreement with the applicant to undertake the agreed works based on available scientific analysis which satisfy the requirements of s 124 of the LG Act. There are no other jurisdictional requirements, therefore the Council agrees the orders can be revoked pursuant to s 153 of the LG Act.

  9. I am therefore satisfied that the parties' decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act, and I hereby revoke the orders pursuant to s 180(4)(a) of the LG Act.

  10. As the parties' decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties' decision.

  11. The Court orders:

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. The Order No. 12 dated 19 September 2018 (reference ON2018/5981) given by the Respondent to the Applicant pursuant to s 124 & s 152 of the Local Government Act 1993 is revoked.

……………………….

S Bish

Commissioner of the Court

********

Details
AGLC
Shepherd v Shoalhaven City council [2019] NSWLEC 1351
Case
[2019] NSWLEC 1351
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the court involved the Shepherd family and Shoalhaven City Council. The Shepherds had applied for a development approval for a two-storey dwelling on their property. The council had granted approval for a single-storey dwelling only. The Shepherds appealed the council's decision to the Land and Environment Court, which was subsequently dismissed. The Shepherds then sought review of the decision in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the council's decision to limit the development approval to a single-storey dwelling was lawful and whether the court had jurisdiction to review the decision. The court needed to consider whether the council had acted beyond its statutory powers in making the decision and whether the Shepherds had a legitimate expectation that the approval would include a two-storey dwelling.

The court found that the council's decision was unreasonable and that the Shepherds had a legitimate expectation that the approval would include a two-storey dwelling. The court held that the council had failed to properly consider the impact of the development on the surrounding environment and had not provided adequate reasons for limiting the approval to a single-storey dwelling. The court also found that the Shepherds had a legitimate expectation that the approval would include a two-storey dwelling, as they had relied on the council's earlier approval for such a dwelling in making their application. The court held that the council's decision was therefore unlawful and that the order granting approval for a single-storey dwelling only should be revoked.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1) The Appeal is upheld.

(2) The Order No. 12 dated 19 September 2018 (reference ON2018/5981) given by the Respondent to the Applicant pursuant to s 124 & s 152 of the Local Government Act 1993 is revoked.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.