Shelton and Bloomfield
Case
•
[2007] FamCA 311
•20 February 2007
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shelton and Bloomfield [2007] FamCA 311
[2007] FamCA 311
20 February 2007
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned orders made by Jordan J regarding the living arrangements and time spent with two sons, born in September 1999 and March 2002, respectively. The primary dispute revolved around the children living with their mother and the mother's proposed relocation from W to the M area. The court also addressed the father's time with the children, shared parental responsibility for major decisions, and communication protocols between the parents.
The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for the children's residence, including whether to permit the mother to relocate with them. Further issues included the division of time the children would spend with each parent, the nature of their shared responsibility for significant decisions concerning the children's welfare, and the mechanisms for communication and information sharing between the parents regarding the children's health, education, and social activities. The court also had to consider the duration of these orders and the potential for their review.
Jordan J made orders that the children would live with the mother and permitted her to relocate to the M area. The parents were to share responsibility for major decisions, and detailed provisions were set out for the father's time with the children, including specific weekend and holiday arrangements, as well as telephone communication. The orders also stipulated that the mother would keep the father informed of various aspects of the children's lives, including medical issues, school matters, and social events, and that both parents would make genuine efforts to reach joint decisions on education and health. In the event of an inability to agree on long-term issues, the parties were directed to participate in family dispute resolution. The orders were to remain in force until the elder child turned 12, at which point they were to be reviewed. The court also included a fact sheet detailing the obligations and consequences of contravention, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the Family Law Act.
The court was required to determine the specific arrangements for the children's residence, including whether to permit the mother to relocate with them. Further issues included the division of time the children would spend with each parent, the nature of their shared responsibility for significant decisions concerning the children's welfare, and the mechanisms for communication and information sharing between the parents regarding the children's health, education, and social activities. The court also had to consider the duration of these orders and the potential for their review.
Jordan J made orders that the children would live with the mother and permitted her to relocate to the M area. The parents were to share responsibility for major decisions, and detailed provisions were set out for the father's time with the children, including specific weekend and holiday arrangements, as well as telephone communication. The orders also stipulated that the mother would keep the father informed of various aspects of the children's lives, including medical issues, school matters, and social events, and that both parents would make genuine efforts to reach joint decisions on education and health. In the event of an inability to agree on long-term issues, the parties were directed to participate in family dispute resolution. The orders were to remain in force until the elder child turned 12, at which point they were to be reviewed. The court also included a fact sheet detailing the obligations and consequences of contravention, pursuant to sections 65DA(2) and 62B of the Family Law Act.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Shelton and Bloomfield [2007] FamCA 311
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0