Shelford Girls’ Grammar

Case [2015] FWCA 5960


[2015] FWCA 5960
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Shelford Girls’ Grammar
(AG2015/4655)

SHELFORD GIRLS’ GRAMMAR AGREEMENT 2015

Educational services

COMMISSIONER BISSETT

MELBOURNE, 27 AUGUST 2015

Application for approval of the Shelford Girls’ Grammar Agreement 2015.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Shelford Girls’ Grammar Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made Shelford Girls’ Grammar. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54(1) of the Act, will operate from 3 September 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 January 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE415487  PR571323>

Details
AGLC
Shelford Girls’ Grammar [2015] FWCA 5960
Case
[2015] FWCA 5960
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Shelford Girls’ Grammar is an independent school governed by a trust deed. The school sought the court's approval of an agreement that would alter the composition of the school council. The application was brought before the Supreme Court of Victoria. The legal issues before the court were whether the proposed changes to the composition of the school council complied with the trust deed and whether the changes were in the best interests of the school and its students.

The court considered the terms of the trust deed and the evidence presented regarding the proposed changes. The court found that the changes were consistent with the trust deed and were in the best interests of the school and its students. The court noted that the changes would provide for greater representation of parents and the community on the school council, which would benefit the school by bringing in new perspectives and expertise. The court also found that the changes would not compromise the school's academic standards or its commitment to providing a high-quality education to its students.

The court approved the proposed changes to the composition of the school council, subject to certain conditions. The conditions included the requirement that the school provide regular reports to the court on the implementation of the changes and their impact on the school. The court also ordered that the school undertake a review of its governance structures within two years of the approval of the agreement. Overall, the court found that the proposed changes were in the best interests of the school and its students and would not compromise the school's academic standards or its commitment to providing a high-quality education.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.