Shannon v Park Equipment Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2006] QSC 284
•5 October 2006
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Shannon v Park Equipment Pty Ltd [2006] QSC 284
[2006] QSC 284
5 October 2006
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In Shannon v Park Equipment Pty Ltd, the plaintiff sought to enforce a requirement that the defendant produce a list of documents pursuant to the rules of court. The defendants argued that it would be inconvenient to deliver the documents produced due to their number, size, quantity, and volume. The plaintiff, on the other hand, submitted that regardless of the size, quantity, or volume of the documents, the defendant was required to produce a list of those documents.
The court was required to decide whether the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents. The court examined the rules which provide that in the circumstances, disclosure may be effected by production. The court considered whether the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents.
The court found that the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents. The court dismissed the application and found that the defendants were not required to deliver the documents produced. The court concluded that the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents.
The court dismissed the application and found that the defendants were not required to deliver the documents produced. This was the final order of the court.
The court was required to decide whether the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents. The court examined the rules which provide that in the circumstances, disclosure may be effected by production. The court considered whether the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents.
The court found that the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents. The court dismissed the application and found that the defendants were not required to deliver the documents produced. The court concluded that the defendants had satisfied the requirements of the rules by producing a list of the privileged documents.
The court dismissed the application and found that the defendants were not required to deliver the documents produced. This was the final order of the court.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery & Disclosure
-
Privilege
-
Interlocutory Orders
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1