Sesalim and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review)
Case
•
[2018] AATA 384
•2 March 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sesalim and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2018] AATA 384
[2018] AATA 384
2 March 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) by Sesalim against a decision of the Secretary, Department of Social Services (DSS). The dispute related to Sesalim's eligibility for a disability support pension.
The AAT was required to determine whether Sesalim met the criteria for a disability support pension, specifically whether they had a continuing inability to work and whether their impairments were permanent and fully diagnosed, treated, and stabilised.
Deputy S A Forgie P considered the evidence presented regarding Sesalim's medical conditions and their impact on their capacity to work. The Tribunal applied the principles established in relevant social security legislation and case law, focusing on the assessment of functional capacity and the permanence of impairments. The Tribunal found that Sesalim's impairments were not permanent and fully diagnosed, treated, and stabilised as required by the legislation.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Secretary, Department of Social Services.
The AAT was required to determine whether Sesalim met the criteria for a disability support pension, specifically whether they had a continuing inability to work and whether their impairments were permanent and fully diagnosed, treated, and stabilised.
Deputy S A Forgie P considered the evidence presented regarding Sesalim's medical conditions and their impact on their capacity to work. The Tribunal applied the principles established in relevant social security legislation and case law, focusing on the assessment of functional capacity and the permanence of impairments. The Tribunal found that Sesalim's impairments were not permanent and fully diagnosed, treated, and stabilised as required by the legislation.
The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Secretary, Department of Social Services.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Administrative Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Sesalim and Secretary, Department of Social Services (Social services second review) [2018] AATA 384
Most Recent Citation
Moana and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration) [2016] AATA 1400
Cases Citing This Decision
4
HPZB and Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Migration)
[2019] AATA 5402
QBBP and Minister for Home Affairs (Migration)
[2019] AATA 3905
Cases Cited
4
Statutory Material Cited
0
Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond
[1990] HCA 33
Craig v South Australia
[1995] HCA 58
Lamb v Moss
[1983] FCA 254