| [2019] FWC 7203 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Serra Farming Pty Ltd
(AG2019/1139)
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 17 OCTOBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the Serra Farming Enterprise Agreement 2019 – single enterprise agreement – application dismissed.
[1] Serra Farming Pty Ltd made a single enterprise agreement with its employees known as the Serra Farming Enterprise Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). It seeks that the Agreement be approved.
[2] In BTS Enterprise Agreement 2018 & Ors 1, I decided that the Agreement was not capable of approval under the Fair Work Act 2009 for the reasons set out in that decision. An opportunity for further submissions or undertakings was provided.2 No materials were received in the time allowed.
[3] The application is dismissed.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR713469>
2 Ibid.
- AGLC
- Serra Farming Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 7203
- Case
- [2019] FWC 7203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the Serra Farming Enterprise Agreement 2019 complied with the statutory provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was fair and reasonable in all its terms. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement was appropriately negotiated, included necessary provisions, and was fair and reasonable considering the specific circumstances of the parties involved. The union argued that the agreement lacked certain mandatory terms and that it was not negotiated in good faith.
In evaluating the application, the Commission found that the Serra Farming Enterprise Agreement 2019 did not comply with the mandatory requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the agreement omitted several terms that should have been included, such as provisions for minimum rates of pay and leave entitlements. Additionally, the Commission noted that there were procedural irregularities in the negotiation process, which raised doubts about the good faith of the bargaining. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed due to these deficiencies and procedural shortcomings. The Commission's decision underscored the importance of adhering to legislative requirements and the necessity of a fair and transparent negotiation process.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.