| [2020] FWCA 1701 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Serco Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2020/674)
SERCO AUSTRALIA OPEN SPACE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 2020
Gardening services | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 30 MARCH 2020 |
Application for approval of the Serco Australia Open Space Employment Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Serco Australia Open Space Employment Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). It has been made by Serco Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union and the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 6 April 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE507611 PR717927>
- AGLC
- Serco Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 1701
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 1701
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement complied with the requirements of section 233 of the Act, which sets out the conditions that must be met for an enterprise agreement to be approved as a transitional instrument. The Commission considered whether the agreement provided for appropriate mechanisms for the resolution of workplace disputes and whether it contained appropriate minimum terms and conditions for the employees it covered.
In assessing the application, the Commission noted that the agreement provided for dispute resolution mechanisms that were consistent with those in the relevant modern awards. The Commission also found that the agreement contained minimum terms and conditions that were at least as good as, and in some cases better than, those contained in the relevant modern awards. The Commission concluded that the agreement met the requirements of section 233 of the Act and approved the agreement as a transitional instrument.
The Commission's decision was final and binding, and could not be appealed. The approved agreement would apply to the employees it covered for a period of up to four years, until a new enterprise agreement was made or until the agreement was replaced by a modern award. The Commission's decision provides guidance to employers and employees on the requirements for approving transitional instruments under the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.