Seidler and Cerny

In *Seidler and Cerny*, heard before Rees J, the husband sought to set aside property settlement orders made on 25 May 2016 and also filed an application for contravention. The wife sought to uphold the original property settlement orders.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the property settlement orders made on 25 May 2016 should be set aside. This required the court to consider the grounds upon which such orders could be vitiated, particularly in light of the husband's application.

Rees J determined that the original property settlement orders should be set aside. The court also dismissed the husband's application for contravention. Consequently, the file was referred to the Registrar for further directions concerning the ongoing financial proceedings.