Seetha Raman (Migration)

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) considered the case of Seetha Raman concerning the cancellation of her Subclass 476 (Skilled – Recognised Graduate) visa. The applicant sought review of the delegate's decision to cancel her visa.

The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the delegate had correctly applied the provisions of the *Migration Act 1958* (Cth) and the *Migration Regulations 1994* (Cth) in cancelling Ms. Raman's visa. Specifically, the Tribunal had to determine if the applicant had provided bogus documents or incorrect information, which are grounds for cancellation under the Act.

The Tribunal, after considering all the circumstances, concluded that the grounds for cancellation were established. The Tribunal affirmed the delegate's decision, finding that the applicant had indeed provided bogus documents and/or incorrect information, leading to the cancellation of her visa.