| [2023] FWCA 2594 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Sedco Forex International Inc
(AG2023/2504)
SEDCO FOREX INTERNATIONAL INC OFFSHORE EMPLOYEE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
| Oil and gas industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT O’KEEFFE | PERTH, 16 AUGUST 2023 |
Application for termination of the Sedco Forex International Inc Offshore Employee Enterprise Agreement 2017
An application pursuant to s225 of the Fair Work Act (Cth) (the Act) has been made by Sedco Forex International Inc. (the Applicant) to terminate the Sedco Forex International Inc Offshore Employee Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement).
Section 225 of the Act provides as follows:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a)one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b)an employee covered by the agreement;
(c)an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”
The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 1 February 2022. Sedco Forex International Inc. is an employer covered by the Agreement and has standing to make the application as per s225(a).
The Applicant has provided a statutory declaration stating that the Agreement does not cover any employees. There is no employee organization covered by the Agreement.
The criteria for termination of an agreement are set out in s226 of the Act, the relevant parts of which are as follows:
“226 Terminating an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
(1)If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a)…
(b)the FWC is satisfied that the agreement does not, and is not likely to, cover any employees; or
(c)…
(1A)However, the FWC must terminate the enterprise agreement under subsection (1) only if the FWC is satisfied that it is appropriate in all the circumstances to do so.
(2)…
(3)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC must consider the views of the following covered by the agreement:
(a)the employees (unless there are no employees covered by the agreement);
(b)each employer;
(c)each employee organisation (if any).
(4)…
(5)In deciding whether to terminate the agreement, the FWC may also have regard to any other relevant matter.”
Following correspondence with the Applicant, I have been advised that discussions for a greenfields agreement to cover prospective work that would have been covered by the Agreement have been taking place with the “Offshore Alliance”, being the Australian Workers Union and the Maritime Division of the CFMMEU. On 14 August 2023 I received correspondence from the Offshore Alliance confirming that they support termination of the Agreement.
I am satisfied that the relevant requirements for termination under s226 have been met and I consider that in all the circumstances it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. The termination will come into effect on 16 August 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427210 PR765274>
- AGLC
- Sedco Forex International Inc [2023] FWCA 2594
- Case
- [2023] FWCA 2594
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court were whether the applicant had demonstrated that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement would have a detrimental effect on its business and whether the agreement could be terminated in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009. The court needed to consider the criteria for terminating an enterprise agreement, including whether the applicant could show that the agreement had become inappropriate due to changed circumstances.
The Fair Work Commission, in its decision, found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the continued operation of the enterprise agreement was detrimental to its business. The Commission considered the economic evidence provided, the nature of the changes in the business environment, and the overall impact on the employees. Given that the applicant had not met the threshold for termination, the Commission dismissed the application. The court emphasised the importance of substantial evidence to support claims of changed circumstances warranting the termination of an enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.