AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA WEDNESDAY, 31 MAY 2017
AMENDED LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00am
For Hearing
Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd
v
John Fuglsang Developments Pty Ltd and Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd
John Fuglsang Developments Pty Ltd and Salamanca Inn Holdings Pty Ltd v
Sultan Holdings Pty Ltd and Hobart City Council
(Part-Heard)
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Martyn John Carpenter
Joshua Paul Barrow
Margarita Alisha Pepita Nichols
Braedon Isaac Males
Rianna Rochelle Lumley
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nigel Maxwell Scott
WLH
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Brayden Craig Hayes
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
Submissions – Costs
Bindy-Ann Daniels
v
Tasmanian Health Service and ors
12:30 p.m.
Discovery
Jonathon Link by way of his Litigation Guardian Lisa Link
v
Tasmanian Health Service
4:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Print Mail Logistics Limited
v
Bruno Lei and anor
4:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
Roger Shepherd
v
Jeffrey James
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Brooke Alyce Andriuskevicius
(part-heard)
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Scott William Cartwright
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Second Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Wednesday, 31 May 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 127
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 127
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court pertain to the validity and implications of the contracts between the parties, potentially involving property law, contractual obligations, and possibly local council regulations impacting the property development. The court was required to determine whether the contracts were properly executed and whether any breaches occurred that warranted legal recourse.
The reasoning and outcome of the case were not detailed in the provided document. The Full Court would have considered evidence, legal arguments, and applicable laws to reach a decision. As the case was part-heard, a final determination was not made on the date of the hearing.
No final orders were made on 31 May 2017, as the case was part-heard. Further hearings would be required to reach a final decision.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.