SECOND AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA THURSDAY, 16 FEBRUARY 2017
SECOND AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
DJL
Michelle Lee Arnott
Kelly Raema Mundy-Page
For Trial
Kaylene Margaret Smith
(Part Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Timothy Lee King
(Part-Heard)
For Sentence
Anthony Frank Brooks
Dale Ivan Jones
Kellie Natasha Jones
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited
v
Her Majesty’s Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Launceston
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Victoria Elizabeth Burton
To Follow
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Timothy Paul Cox
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Second Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Thursday, 16 February 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 36
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 36
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was tasked with determining various legal issues related to the scheduled cases, including the admissibility of evidence, sentencing guidelines, and the resolution of civil disputes. In the criminal cases, the court had to consider the evidence presented, the arguments from both prosecution and defence, and the appropriate sentences for convicted defendants. For the civil case, the court had to review the arguments from both parties and deliver a judgment based on the interpretation of relevant laws and precedents.
Justices and Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of Tasmania, along with other presiding judges, addressed the cases as scheduled. In the civil case, the court delivered a judgment in favour of Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited against Her Majesty’s Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania. The reasoning and outcome of the other cases were not specified in the document. The court followed the established procedures and legal principles to resolve the matters presented to it.
The final orders of the court were not explicitly stated in the document. However, it is implied that the court delivered judgments and orders in line with the outcomes of the hearings and trials as scheduled in the amended law lists.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.