Second Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 17 March 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 64


SECOND AMENDED LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 17 MARCH 2017

SECOND AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Director of Public Prosecutions
v
Darrel George Harington

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Samuel John Everard
Brett Andrew Imlach
Dale Stephen Russell Howlett

For Trial
Kyle Rix Stephens
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
JAK

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
LR

For Bail Consent
Janaya Kathleen Wilson
Aron Paul Thogersen

For Mention
Duncan Francis Cook

For Plea
Jacki Gail Drew


11:30 a.m.
For Plea
Benjamin Lee Noyes

2:15 p.m.
For Plea
Jacob Ivan Davis

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Matthew Rompa

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Nigel Burch
v
Douglas Parkinson and anor

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention
Paul Anthony Shaw

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Charles John Rattray

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Andrew Eric Roach

To Follow
For Special Hearing
Gary Hilton Williams

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Acting Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul James Abraham
Anthony Byron Young

For Directions Hearing
TWD
MAG

For Legal Argument
Quentin John Lucas

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Second Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 17 March 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 64
Case
[2017] TASSCCourtlist 64
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Second Amended Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Friday, 17 March 2017, details various cases scheduled across multiple courts and jurisdictions. The lists include both criminal and civil matters. In Hobart, the Court of Criminal Appeal has a case against Darrel George Harington scheduled for judgment before Justice Tennent. Other cases listed for mention and trial are scheduled before various justices. Launceston has a civil matter listed for hearing, while Burnie has a range of cases scheduled, including mentions, a directions hearing, and legal argument.

The legal issues encompassed in these cases likely involve a variety of criminal and civil matters, including preliminary proceedings, bail applications, pleas, and trials. Each case may present unique legal challenges and require consideration of relevant laws and precedents. The Supreme Court of Tasmania is tasked with adjudicating these matters, ensuring that justice is served according to the applicable legal standards.

The court's reasoning and outcomes will be determined based on the evidence and arguments presented in each case. For the criminal cases, the court will consider the prosecution's case against the accused, defence arguments, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. In civil matters, the court will assess the claims and defenses put forward by the parties and apply the relevant legal principles to reach a decision. Each case will be handled with due process, and the outcomes will be based on the merits of the individual cases.

The final orders will be issued by the respective justices after considering all the evidence and arguments presented. These orders will reflect the court's determination on the issues raised and will provide direction for any subsequent legal proceedings or actions. The detailed scheduling and listing of cases ensure that the court can efficiently manage its workload and provide timely resolutions to the matters before it.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.