Seagoing Industry Award 2010
Case
•
[2018] FWCFB 129
•12 JANUARY 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Seagoing Industry Award 2010 [2018] FWCFB 129
[2018] FWCFB 129
12 JANUARY 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Fair Work Commission, the Seagoing Industry Award Review 2010 was the subject of a dispute. The Seagoing Master Mariners' Association of Australia brought forward the case, asserting that the current award contained inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards (NES) as stipulated in the Fair Work Act 2009. The association claimed that the award's provisions on maximum weekly hours for seafarers, particularly those working on vessels granted a temporary licence, did not align with the NES. This inconsistency, it was argued, contravened section 62(1) of the Fair Work Act, which mandates that awards must not conflict with the NES.
The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the provisions of the Seagoing Industry Award 2010, specifically those related to maximum weekly hours for seafarers on temporarily licensed vessels, were consistent with the NES. The association contended that these provisions failed to meet the NES's requirements, which state that an employee should not work more than 38 hours per week unless an exemption applies. The commission had to determine whether the award's provisions were in line with the NES and, if not, what adjustments, if any, were necessary.
In its reasoning, the commission meticulously examined the award's provisions concerning maximum weekly hours and compared them with the NES. The commission found that the award indeed contained inconsistencies, as it allowed for more than 38 hours of work per week for seafarers on temporarily licensed vessels without an appropriate exemption. Given this finding, the commission amended the award to ensure it aligned with the NES, specifically by correcting the maximum weekly hours for these employees. The adjustments were made to ensure compliance with the statutory requirement that awards must not conflict with the NES.
The final orders of the commission included specific amendments to the Seagoing Industry Award 2010 to align the maximum weekly hours for seafarers on temporarily licensed vessels with the NES. These changes were aimed at ensuring that the award did not contravene section 62(1) of the Fair Work Act, thereby maintaining consistency with the NES and protecting the rights of seafarers under the award.
The primary legal issue before the commission was whether the provisions of the Seagoing Industry Award 2010, specifically those related to maximum weekly hours for seafarers on temporarily licensed vessels, were consistent with the NES. The association contended that these provisions failed to meet the NES's requirements, which state that an employee should not work more than 38 hours per week unless an exemption applies. The commission had to determine whether the award's provisions were in line with the NES and, if not, what adjustments, if any, were necessary.
In its reasoning, the commission meticulously examined the award's provisions concerning maximum weekly hours and compared them with the NES. The commission found that the award indeed contained inconsistencies, as it allowed for more than 38 hours of work per week for seafarers on temporarily licensed vessels without an appropriate exemption. Given this finding, the commission amended the award to ensure it aligned with the NES, specifically by correcting the maximum weekly hours for these employees. The adjustments were made to ensure compliance with the statutory requirement that awards must not conflict with the NES.
The final orders of the commission included specific amendments to the Seagoing Industry Award 2010 to align the maximum weekly hours for seafarers on temporarily licensed vessels with the NES. These changes were aimed at ensuring that the award did not contravene section 62(1) of the Fair Work Act, thereby maintaining consistency with the NES and protecting the rights of seafarers under the award.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Labour Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Implied Terms
-
Unconscionable Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
4 yearly review of modern awards [2020] FWCFB 421
Cases Citing This Decision
10
4 yearly review of modern awards
[2020] FWCFB 2124
Seagoing Industry Award 2010
[2020] FWCFB 1514
4 yearly review of modern awards
[2020] FWCFB 421
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Modern Awards Review 2012—Awards with no applications to vary
[2012] FWA 10657
VSHIPS Australia Pty Ltd; CSL Australia Pty Ltd
[2013] FWC 5414
Modern Awards Review 2012—Awards with no applications to vary
[2012] FWA 10657