SCVG and KLD (No. 2)
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 78
•16 February 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
SCVG and KLD (No. 2) [2018] FamCA 78
[2018] FamCA 78
16 February 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of SCVG and KLD (No. 2), Gill J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application concerning the admissibility of certain documents in ongoing proceedings. The dispute involved the parties SCVG and KLD, and the court was tasked with determining whether specific pages of a document, SVG2, were admissible as evidence.
The primary legal issue before the court was the admissibility of pages C115 to C148 of SVG2. This involved a consideration of whether any parts of these documents were relevant or otherwise excluded from admission due to their reference to a third party, J Pty Ltd.
Gill J ruled that pages C115 to C148 of SVG2 were admissible in the proceedings, with the specific exclusion of any references to J Pty Ltd. This decision indicates a partial admission of the evidence, allowing the bulk of the document while redacting or excluding the parts pertaining to the third party. The proceedings were subsequently adjourned for a further hearing.
The primary legal issue before the court was the admissibility of pages C115 to C148 of SVG2. This involved a consideration of whether any parts of these documents were relevant or otherwise excluded from admission due to their reference to a third party, J Pty Ltd.
Gill J ruled that pages C115 to C148 of SVG2 were admissible in the proceedings, with the specific exclusion of any references to J Pty Ltd. This decision indicates a partial admission of the evidence, allowing the bulk of the document while redacting or excluding the parts pertaining to the third party. The proceedings were subsequently adjourned for a further hearing.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
SCVG and KLD (No. 2) [2018] FamCA 78
Cases Citing This Decision
0