[2013] FWCA 2908 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Scubaroo Dive Onslow Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1051)
SCUBAROO DIVE ONSLOW PTY LTD MUA JDN CONTRACT PROPELLED DREDGING GREENFIELD AGREEMENT 2013
Dredging industry | |
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON | SYDNEY, 10 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Scubaroo Dive Onslow Pty Ltd MUA JDN Contract Propelled Dredging Greenfield Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Scubaroo Dive Onslow Pty Ltd MUA JDN Contract Propelled Dredging Greenfield Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement. It has been made by Scubaroo Dive Onslow Pty Ltd and The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA).
[2] The application is made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.In particular, I am satisfied that the MUA is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 17 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 8 February 2016.
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401184 PR536489>
- AGLC
- Scubaroo Dive Onslow Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 2908
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 2908
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the impact of the proposed changes on the employees' terms and conditions, the need for the changes in the context of the business operations, and the overall fairness of the agreement. The applicant argued that the changes were necessary to maintain the business's competitiveness and sustainability, while the respondent, representing the employees, contended that the changes would adversely affect the employees' conditions. After reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission determined that the proposed changes were fair and reasonable. The Commission found that the applicant had demonstrated a genuine need for the changes, and that the changes would not result in a significant detriment to the employees.
Accordingly, the Commission approved the proposed modifications to the agreement. The orders of the Commission included the approval of the modified agreement, which would now incorporate the changes to the pay rates and conditions as proposed by the applicant. The modified agreement was to be in effect from the date of the Commission's decision, and both parties were directed to take all necessary steps to implement the changes in accordance with the approved agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.