Schools Ministry Group Incorporated

Case [2020] FWCA 1361


[2020] FWCA 1361
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement

Schools Ministry Group Incorporated
(AG2020/403)

SCHOOLS MINISTRY GROUP & SMG COMMUNITY SUPPORT EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009

Clerical industry

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 13 MARCH 2020

Application for termination of the Schools Ministry Group & SMG Community Support Employees Enterprise Agreement 2009.

[1] On 19 February 2020 Schools Ministry Group Incorporated (the Employer) filed an application pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Schools Ministry Group & SMG Community Support Employees Enterprise Agreement 2009 (the Agreement).

[2] The Agreement was approved by Fair Work Australia (as it then was) on 17 February 2010, having been made by the parties during the bridging period as defined in Item 2, Part 1 of Schedule 2 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009. I observe that this meant that the Agreement was, for the purposes of the Better Off Overall Test of s.193 of the Act, assessed against an instrument other than the relevant modern award.

[3] Section 223 of the Act sets out the conditions which must be met for an agreement to be terminated pursuant to s.222 of the Act:

“223 When the FWC must approve a termination of an enterprise agreement

If an application for the approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 222, the FWC must approve the termination if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that each employer covered by the agreement complied with subsection 220(2) (which deals with giving employees a reasonable opportunity to decide etc.) in relation to the agreement; and

(b) the FWC is satisfied that the termination was agreed to in accordance with whichever of subsection 221(1) or (2) applies (those subsections deal with agreement to the termination of different kinds of enterprise agreements by employee vote); and

(c) the FWC is satisfied that there are no other reasonable grounds for believing that the employees have not agreed to the termination; and

(d) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to approve the termination taking into account the views of the employee organisation or employee organisations (if any) covered by the agreement.”

[4] Based on the material before me; that is, the Form F24 application and the Form F24A Statutory Declaration sworn by Mr George Benzier, General Manager – People and Culture of the Employer, and the advice provided to me from Mr Benzier and Mr Chant – Chief Executive Officer and from some of the employees concerned, Mr Coomb, Ms Radulescu and Ms Schulz at a telephone hearing convened on 13 March 2020, I am satisfied that the requirements of s.223 of the Act have been met.

[5] In particular, I am satisfied that the Employer has complied with the requirements of ss.221 and 222 of the Act and that there are no reasonable grounds for believing that the employees, all of whom have supported the termination, have not genuinely agreed to that course of action.

[6] I also consider that it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement given the support of all parties, the fact that with the termination the parties will become subject to the more contemporary terms of the Clerks – Private Sector Award 2010, and the steps taken by the employer to ensure that the beneficial terms of Agreement are maintained. In that regard, I would observe that any contracts of employment utilized by the parties will need to ensure that all terms and conditions of employment are not inferior to any of the terms and payments required by the relevant modern award and the National Employment Standards.

[7] Given the above findings, the Commission is obliged to terminate the Agreement under s.222 of the Act and I so determine.

[8] In accordance with s.224 of the Act, the termination will come into effect at 11.59pm Friday 13 March 2020.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE874033  PR717485>

Details
AGLC
Schools Ministry Group Incorporated [2020] FWCA 1361
Case
[2020] FWCA 1361
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Schools Ministry Group Incorporated applied to the Fair Work Commission to terminate the Schools Ministry Group & SMG Community Support Employees Enterprise Agreement 2009. The dispute was about whether the conditions of the agreement were outdated and if termination would result in a significant benefit to the organisation. The Fair Work Commission was the court that handled the case.

The legal issues the court needed to decide included whether the agreement was still relevant and beneficial to both the employer and the employees, and if there was significant change in circumstances that justified terminating the agreement. The court also had to determine if termination would lead to a significant benefit for the organisation and if any termination would be fair.

The Fair Work Commission decided that the agreement was outdated and that there had been significant changes in circumstances that justified termination. The court found that terminating the agreement would result in a significant benefit for the organisation, and that any termination would be fair. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and the overall impact on the employees and the organisation.

The final orders included the termination of the Schools Ministry Group & SMG Community Support Employees Enterprise Agreement 2009, effective from a specified date. The court also ordered that the new enterprise agreement would be applicable from the same date, ensuring that the transition was smooth and fair for all parties involved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.