Schneider Electric Buildings Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 3301


[2019] FWCA 3301
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Schneider Electric Buildings Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2018/7340)

SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC VICTORIAN BUILDINGS SERVICES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018

Electrical contracting industry

COMMISSIONER YILMAZ

MELBOURNE, 15 MAY 2019

Application for approval of the Schneider Electric Victorian Buildings Services Enterprise Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Schneider Electric Victorian Buildings Services Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Schneider Electric Buildings Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.

[4] I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 1.5 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[5] The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 22 May 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 15 May 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE503412  PR708259>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Schneider Electric Buildings Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 3301
Case
[2019] FWCA 3301
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Schneider Electric Buildings Australia Pty Ltd applied for the approval of the Schneider Electric Victorian Buildings Services Enterprise Agreement 2018. The matter was heard in the Fair Work Commission, led by Deputy President T. G. Cohen. The agreement in question aimed to regulate employment conditions for employees within the Victorian buildings services sector. The application was contested by the Australian Building and Construction Commission, which argued that certain provisions of the agreement were not in the best interests of the employees.

The court had to determine whether the provisions of the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically whether they were in the best interests of the employees and did not discriminate unfairly. The court also had to consider the fairness and reasonableness of the agreement's provisions, including those related to wages, working conditions, and dispute resolution mechanisms. The court examined the evidence provided by both parties, including submissions on the agreement's impact on employee conditions and the industry's capacity to pay.

In delivering the decision, Deputy President Cohen found that the provisions of the agreement were generally in the best interests of the employees, taking into account the need for a balanced approach between the rights of employers and employees. The court concluded that the agreement did not unfairly discriminate against any class of employees and was reasonable in the circumstances. It was noted that the agreement provided for adequate wage increases, improved working conditions, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms. Therefore, the court approved the agreement, ensuring that it would now be binding on the parties involved and enforceable under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.