[2013] FWCA 481 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Schiavello (SA) Pty Ltd
(AG2013/68)
SCHIAVELLO (SA) PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012 - 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT O'CALLAGHAN | ADELAIDE, 23 JANUARY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Schiavello (SA) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Schiavello (SA) Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Schiavello (SA) Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement was not lodged within 14 days after it was made. Pursuant to s.185(3)(b) of the Act I consider it fair to extend the time for making this application to the actual date of lodgement.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 31 January 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2015.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE899487 PR533374>
- AGLC
- Schiavello (SA) Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 481
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 481
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission included whether certain clauses in the agreement were properly formed, if they complied with the relevant statutory requirements, and whether they met the 'better off overall test'. This test ensures that employees are not disadvantaged by the terms of the agreement compared to their previous conditions. The Commission also had to consider if the agreement had been genuinely negotiated between the parties and if it adhered to the procedural fairness principles.
The Commission reviewed the evidence provided and found that the agreement had been negotiated in good faith and complied with the necessary statutory provisions. The better off overall test was satisfied as the new conditions provided benefits to the employees that outweighed any detriments. The Commission approved the agreement, affirming that it was a valid and enforceable enterprise agreement. The decision was made in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 and relevant regulations.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.