Schenker Australia Pty Ltd T/A Db Schenker

Case [2025] FWCA 464


[2025] FWCA 464

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Schenker Australia Pty Ltd T/A Db Schenker

(AG2024/5309)

SCHENKER AUSTRALIA PTY LTD QUEENSLAND DISTRIBUTION CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Road transport industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 5 FEBRUARY 2025

Application for approval of the Schenker Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. This decision deals with an application made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Schenker Australia Pty Ltd Queensland Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Schenker Australia Pty Ltd T/A DB Schenker (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different name for the Agreement to that which was eventually made. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]

  1. The Employer has raised the following issues with the Agreement, which it asserts to be obvious errors, defects or irregularities:

·   Clause 24.6(b) of the Agreement incorrectly references training at clause 24.6 which should instead reference clause 24.7.

The Employer has provided an updated copy of the Agreement which corrected this error. The views of bargaining representatives are supportive of these assertions and their history. I am satisfied that these issues each constitute an obvious error, defect, or irregularity and I will amend the Agreement accordingly pursuant to s.218A of the Act.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

  1. Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 14.6(a) – Compassionate Leave.

·   Clause 19.3(c) – Abandonment of employment.

However, noting clause 5.9(b) of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The United Workers Union (UWU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the UWU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate from 12 February 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2027.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].

[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE527918  PR784035>

Details
AGLC
Schenker Australia Pty Ltd T/A Db Schenker [2025] FWCA 464
Case
[2025] FWCA 464
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Fair Work Commission involved Schenker Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Db Schenker, which sought approval for its Queensland Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2024. The application aimed to formalise the terms and conditions of employment for the workers at the Queensland Distribution Centre. The nature of the dispute was primarily about whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009.

The legal issues that the Fair Work Commission had to address included whether the agreement met the criteria for "better off overall" as stipulated in the Fair Work Act. This involved evaluating if the agreement provided employees with a fair and reasonable set of conditions compared to their previous terms and conditions, and whether it complied with any applicable awards or instruments. Additionally, the Commission needed to consider whether the agreement had been made in good faith and whether the required bargaining procedures were followed.

In its decision, the Fair Work Commission assessed the evidence provided by both parties and examined the terms of the proposed agreement. The Commission found that the agreement provided employees with a fair set of conditions and was considered better off overall for the workforce. The Commission also concluded that the agreement was made in good faith and that the necessary bargaining processes were adhered to. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the Queensland Distribution Centre Enterprise Agreement 2024.

As a result of this decision, the Fair Work Commission issued its approval for the enterprise agreement, which now governs the employment terms and conditions for the workers at the Queensland Distribution Centre. This approval ensures that the agreement is legally binding and enforceable under the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.