SAVILLE & SAVILLE

The parties to this proceeding were Saville & Saville, the applicants, and the respondent, whose identity is not specified in the provided text. The dispute concerned an application for an order for possession of premises. The matter was heard by Altobelli J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicants were entitled to an order for possession of the premises. This required the court to consider the nature of the applicants' claim and the legal basis upon which possession could be granted.

Altobelli J determined that the applicants had established their entitlement to possession. The reasoning, though not detailed in the provided text, would have involved an assessment of the evidence presented by the applicants to demonstrate their right to occupy or control the premises, and the respondent's lack of a lawful right to remain. The court applied the relevant legal principles governing claims for possession, which typically involve establishing title or a superior right to occupy.

The court made orders in favour of the applicants, granting the order for possession of the premises.