Sauber & Caito (No 3)

In *Sauber & Caito (No 3)*, the applicant, Ms Sauber, sought to dismiss an application filed on 20 April 2021. The respondent was Mr Caito. The decision was made by Young J.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application to dismiss the existing proceedings should be granted. The court also had regard to the provisions of section 121 of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), which prohibits the publication of identifying information in family law proceedings.

Young J dismissed the application. The court noted that the matter was still listed for trial commencing on 2 June 2021, with three days allocated for the hearing. The court's decision implicitly indicates that the application to dismiss was not considered to have merit at that stage, and the proceedings were to continue towards trial.