Sasip Pty Ltd v Ashe
Case
•
[2021] QCAT 99
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sasip Pty Ltd v Ashe [2021] QCAT 99
[2021] QCAT 99
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The applicant, Sasip Pty Ltd, filed an application for compensation for damage caused by the respondent tenants, Mr Ashe and Mr Huth, during their tenancy of a property at Biggera Waters. The tenants counterclaimed for compensation for expenses incurred due to the applicant’s notice to leave the property on the grounds of owner occupation, which they say was a misuse of the COVID-19 regulations. The application was heard by Adjudicator Lember who found that the tenants had attempted to deceive the Tribunal by fabricating evidence in a concerted effort to reduce or defeat the applicant’s claim. The Tribunal did not dismiss the tenants’ counter application, instead finding on the merits that the notice to leave was lawfully given and that the tenants’ moving expenses were not caused by any breach of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (Qld) or the tenancy agreement. The Tribunal ordered the tenants to pay the applicant $7,080.29 comprising water charges of $123.21, $2,463.64 for carpet damage and $4,493.44 for vinyl floor damage. The Tribunal ordered that the bond held by the Residential Tenancies Authority be released to the applicant in full and that the tenants pay the remaining amount by 31 May 2021.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Residential Tenancy Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Compensatory Damages
-
Betterment
-
Duty to Mitigate
-
Fair Wear and Tear
-
Attempt to Deceive
-
Unconscionable Conduct
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Sasip Pty Ltd v Ashe [2021] QCAT 99
Most Recent Citation
Mills v Ethell [2024] QCATA 67
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Mills v Ethell
[2024] QCATA 67
Kda v Rong He as trustee
[2023] QCATA 5
Mills v Ethell
[2024] QCATA 67
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
0
Stone v Grundy
[2018] QCATA 68
Tracey v Olinderidge Pty Ltd & Wagner
[2015] QCAT 7
Arowana Pty Ltd (t/a Choice IT Australia) v Scott
[2019] QCATA 100