Sarris v Woollahra Municipal Council

Case [2008] NSWLEC 1432



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Sarris v Woollahra Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 1432
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Chris Sarris

RESPONDENT
Woollahra Municipal Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10557 of 2008
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES:

Development Application :- Demolish an existing dwelling and construct a new three-storey residence and garage
Consent orders

height, privacy and overshadowing
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 15/10/2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 15 October 2008
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Mr M. Bonanno, solicitor
of Mills Oakley Lawyers

RESPONDENT
Mr S. Simington, solicitor
of Lindsay Taylor Lawyers


JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Tuor C

      15 October 2008

      10557 of 2008 Chris Sarris v Woollahra Municipal Council

      JUDGMENT

1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the deemed refusal by Woollahra Council (the council) of an application to demolish an existing dwelling and construct a new three-storey residence and garage at 10 Raine Street, Woollahra (the site).

2 The issues between the parties have been resolved through the provision of amended plans and the parties are seeking consent orders from the Court.

3 Council’s principal concern initially related to the three-storey height of the building and the impact on streetscape. This has been addressed by the third storey being set back sufficiently from the street for the building to largely appear as a two-storey building and be consistent in height with other dwellings in the street.

4 Other concerns were raised regarding privacy, which has been addressed by the removal of a terrace over the garage and the imposition of conditions relating to planter boxes.

5 There remains an outstanding concern of the adjoining resident, Mr Nicholson, at 8 Raine Street, the property to the south, in regards to overshadowing of his backyard and north facing windows. The joint expert report prepared by Ms Belinda Thomas and Ms Louise Thom on behalf of Woollahra Council, and Ms Jenny Askins on behalf of the applicant has addressed this issue and concludes that the overshadowing of this property to be acceptable. It states that the Woollahra Development Control Plan (The DCP) does not include controls with regard to solar access to north-facing windows as the DCP allows for development to be built to the boundary.

6 The experts agreed that a compliant development would reduce solar access to the north-facing windows of adjoining properties to the south. The overshadowing of the north-facing windows of 8 Raine Street is therefore consistent with what is anticipated by the planning controls.

7 I accept that the issues between the parties are resolved and that the consent orders sought by the parties can be granted.

Orders

8 The consent orders are:

1. The appeal is upheld.

          2. The development application (855/2007/1) for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a new three-storey residence and garage at 10 Raine Street, Woollahra is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.

      3. The exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and A may be returned.

___________________

      Annelise Tuor
      Commissioner of the Court
Details
AGLC
Sarris v Woollahra Municipal Council [2008] NSWLEC 1432
Case
[2008] NSWLEC 1432
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, the applicant, Chris Sarris, appealed against the Woollahra Municipal Council's deemed refusal of a development application. The proposed development involved demolishing an existing dwelling and constructing a new three-storey residence and garage at 10 Raine Street, Woollahra. The applicant sought consent orders to address the council's concerns about the building's height, privacy, and overshadowing. The Woollahra Municipal Council opposed the application, arguing that the proposed three-storey building would not comply with the local development control plan and would adversely affect neighbouring properties.

The court had to determine whether the amended plans and conditions proposed by the parties addressed the council's concerns about the building's height, privacy, and overshadowing. The court also had to consider whether the proposed development would comply with the local development control plan and whether it would have an adverse impact on neighbouring properties. The court had to assess the evidence presented by the parties and the expert report prepared by the council and the applicant.

The court found that the amended plans and conditions proposed by the parties addressed the council's concerns about the building's height and privacy. The court also found that the overshadowing of the adjoining resident's backyard and north-facing windows was acceptable and consistent with what was anticipated by the planning controls. The court accepted that the issues between the parties were resolved and that the consent orders sought by the parties could be granted. The court granted the consent orders, approving the development application subject to the conditions in Annexure A.

The court ordered that the appeal be upheld, the development application for demolition of an existing dwelling and construction of a new three-storey residence and garage at 10 Raine Street, Woollahra be approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A, and that the exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and A, may be returned.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.