| [2014] FWCA 7789 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Saracen Gold Mines Pty Ltd
(AG2014/9257)
SARACEN GOLD MINES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2014
Mining industry | |
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS | PERTH, 3 NOVEMBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Saracen Gold Mines Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Saracen Gold Mines Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Saracen Gold Mines Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 10 November 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 3 November 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410953 PR557314>
- AGLC
- Saracen Gold Mines Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7789
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7789
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were no less favourable than the applicable awards or registered agreements, and if the agreement was genuinely negotiated. The Commission had to consider if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, and if it had been genuinely negotiated between the parties. The CFMEU argued that certain provisions were not in line with the statutory requirements, while Saracen Gold Mines Pty Ltd maintained that the agreement was fair and had been negotiated in good faith. The Commission's task was to carefully scrutinise the terms of the agreement and assess its compliance with the Fair Work Act.
After a thorough examination of the evidence and submissions, the Commission concluded that the agreement was compliant with the statutory requirements. It found that the agreement provided for terms and conditions that were at least no worse off than the applicable awards or registered agreements. The Commission also found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions. Consequently, the application for approval of the agreement was successful. The decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements meet the statutory requirements and are genuinely negotiated to provide fair and reasonable terms and conditions for employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.