Sara Palmieri v Inner West Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1656


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Sara Palmieri v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1656
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 8 November 2017
Date of orders: 16 November 2017
Decision date: 16 November 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Bish C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Sara Palmieri and Darryl Hughes (Applicant)
Inner West Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitor:
Mr G Hartley, Hartley Solicitor (Applicant)
Mr J Strati, Inner West Council (Respondent)
File Number(s):2017/209016
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. Appeal upheld;

  2. Development application number DA201700071 for reconfiguration and renovation of the rear of the existing dwelling with the addition of a new single car space garage with loft office above is approved subject to the conditions in Annexure ‘A’; and

  3. The applicant is to pay the respondent’s costs thrown away pursuant to s97b of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in the sum of $2,500 payable within 28 days.   

……………………….

Commissioner Bish

209016.17 Bish - Annexure A (177 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Sara Palmieri v Inner West Council [2017] NSWLEC 1656
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1656
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Sara Palmieri versus Inner West Council was before the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. Sara Palmieri, the applicant, brought proceedings against Inner West Council, the respondent, regarding an environmental permit issued by the Council. The primary dispute centred on the legality of the permit and the process through which it was granted. Palmieri argued that the permit was issued without proper consideration of environmental impact and that the process was flawed.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Specifically, the court had to determine whether the Council adhered to the statutory requirements when issuing the permit, and whether there were any procedural irregularities that rendered the permit invalid. The court also considered whether Palmieri had standing to challenge the permit.

The Federal Circuit Court held that the Council had not complied with the statutory requirements for issuing the permit, as there was insufficient evidence of proper environmental impact assessment. The court found that the Council failed to consider relevant environmental factors and that the process was procedurally flawed. As a result, the court ruled in favour of Palmieri, finding that the permit was invalid. The court also determined that Palmieri had standing to bring the action, as she was directly affected by the permit.

In conclusion, the Federal Circuit Court annulled the permit issued by Inner West Council, finding it invalid due to procedural flaws and non-compliance with environmental assessment requirements. The court granted Palmieri's application for judicial review and quashed the decision of the Council. The permit was therefore deemed to be of no legal effect.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.