SANSOM & RAPTIS

In the matter of *Sansom & Raptis*, heard by Small J, the dispute concerned parenting orders for a child born in 2013. The court was required to determine the future parenting arrangements for the child, specifically addressing issues of parental responsibility, the child's residence, and the extent of time the child would spend with each parent.

The court's reasoning focused on the best interests of the child, as mandated by the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth). Small J considered the relevant provisions of the Act, including sections 4AB(2)(c), 60CA, 60CC, and 64B, which guide the court in making decisions that promote the child's welfare. The decision reflects a careful assessment of the circumstances presented to the court, leading to a determination that departed significantly from previous arrangements.

Ultimately, Small J ordered the discharge of all previous parenting orders concerning the child. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility, and the child was ordered to live with her. Crucially, the father was ordered to spend no time with the child. The prior appointment of an Independent Children’s Lawyer was also discharged.