| [2016] FWCA 1484 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
Sandvik Mining and Construction Pty Ltd
(AG2016/2363)
SANDVIK - OLYMPIC DAM MINE CPM SITE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT - 2014
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
COMMISSIONER PLATT | ADELAIDE, 9 MARCH 2016 |
Application for variation of the Sandvik - Olympic Dam Mine CPM site Enterprise Agreement - 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the Sandvik - Olympic Dam Mine CPM site Enterprise Agreement - 2014 (the Agreement). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement. This application was made by the employer, Sandvik Mining and Construction Pty Ltd pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] The variation concerns the On-site allowances set out in the Premiums Table at Appendix 1.
[3] I have considered the application and accompanying declarations in support of the application and am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] The variation to the Agreement is approved and will operate on and from 9 March 2016.
[5] A consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE410434 PR577782>
- AGLC
- Sandvik Mining and Construction Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 1484
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1484
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission considered the economic and operational context of the mine, finding that changes were indeed necessary to address evolving operational requirements and efficiency. It was noted that the proposed shift patterns aimed to better align with operational demands, thereby potentially reducing costs and increasing productivity. The Commission also assessed the procedural fairness of the application, ensuring that the process adhered to the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission found that the application was made in good faith and that there had been adequate consultation with the union.
Following its analysis, the Commission allowed the application for variation, approving the changes to the Enterprise Agreement. It concluded that the proposed alterations were necessary and reasonable under the circumstances, and that the process had been conducted fairly. The approved changes included revised shift patterns and overtime provisions, which the Commission deemed to be in the best interests of both the employer and the employees, given the operational context of the mine. The decision was made in the spirit of maintaining a balanced approach to the needs of the business and the rights of the workforce.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.