Sanchez Gomez (Migration)
Case
•
[2021] AATA 948
•22 February 2021
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Sanchez Gomez (Migration) [2021] AATA 948
[2021] AATA 948
22 February 2021
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Administrative Appeals Tribunal considered an application for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa. The applicant sought review of a decision concerning their enrolment status.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the enrolment criteria for the Subclass 500 visa, specifically criterion cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
The Tribunal received confirmation that the applicant had enrolled in a Graduate Diploma of Management (Learning) at York Business Institute Pty Ltd, with a course duration from 12 April 2021 to 9 April 2023, at a cost of $14,500. A copy of the Confirmation of Enrolment (COE) was provided to the Tribunal prior to the hearing. In light of this new evidence, the Tribunal was satisfied that the enrolment criterion was met.
Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the specified criteria for a Subclass 500 visa.
The primary legal issue before the Tribunal was whether the applicant met the enrolment criteria for the Subclass 500 visa, specifically criterion cl.500.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.
The Tribunal received confirmation that the applicant had enrolled in a Graduate Diploma of Management (Learning) at York Business Institute Pty Ltd, with a course duration from 12 April 2021 to 9 April 2023, at a cost of $14,500. A copy of the Confirmation of Enrolment (COE) was provided to the Tribunal prior to the hearing. In light of this new evidence, the Tribunal was satisfied that the enrolment criterion was met.
Consequently, the Tribunal remitted the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the specified criteria for a Subclass 500 visa.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0