| [2017] FWCA 6716 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
San Carlo Homes for the Aged Pty Ltd T/A San Carlo Homes for the Aged
(AG2017/5371)
SAN CARLO HOMES FOR THE AGED ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER CRIBB | MELBOURNE, 15 DECEMBER 2017 |
Application for approval of the San Carlo Homes for the Aged Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the San Carlo Homes for the Aged Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by San Carlo Homes for the Aged Pty Ltd T/A San Carlo Homes for the Aged. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Health Services Union of Australia (HSU) and Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF), being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover their respective organisations. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers both of these organisations.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 22 December 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2021.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE426538 PR598708>
- AGLC
- San Carlo Homes for the Aged Pty Ltd T/A San Carlo Homes for the Aged [2017] FWCA 6716
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6716
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined various aspects of the agreement, including its coverage, terms, and the process by which it was negotiated. The Commission considered whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009, such as being free from prohibited content and ensuring that employees were not disadvantaged. Additionally, the Commission evaluated whether the agreement was negotiated in good faith and whether it provided fair and reasonable terms for the employees.
After considering all submissions and evidence, the Commission concluded that the proposed agreement did not adequately address certain aspects of employee conditions, particularly concerning shift patterns and rostering. The Commission found that while the agreement was generally fair and reasonable, it fell short in providing for adequate rest periods and predictability in rostering. Consequently, the application for approval was not granted.
The Fair Work Commission did not approve the San Carlo Homes for the Aged Enterprise Agreement 2017, citing deficiencies in addressing employee rest periods and rostering predictability. The Commission directed the parties to negotiate further to address these issues.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.