SAMMARRA & ROSTEM
Case
•
[2015] FamCA 358
•15 May 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
SAMMARRA & ROSTEM [2015] FamCA 358
[2015] FamCA 358
15 May 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Sammarra & Rostem*, Hogan J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application filed on 23 June 2014, the details of which are not fully elaborated in the provided text, but which resulted in the discharge of orders made on 22 July 2014.
The central legal issue before the Court was the determination of the application filed on 23 June 2014, and consequently, the appropriate orders to be made in light of that determination. The Court was also required to consider the potential for an application for costs related to this proceeding.
Hogan J dismissed the Application in a Case filed on 23 June 2014. The Court further stipulated a detailed process for any party seeking an order for costs, requiring written submissions and responses to be filed and served within specific timeframes, with the final consideration of any costs application to occur in Chambers.
The central legal issue before the Court was the determination of the application filed on 23 June 2014, and consequently, the appropriate orders to be made in light of that determination. The Court was also required to consider the potential for an application for costs related to this proceeding.
Hogan J dismissed the Application in a Case filed on 23 June 2014. The Court further stipulated a detailed process for any party seeking an order for costs, requiring written submissions and responses to be filed and served within specific timeframes, with the final consideration of any costs application to occur in Chambers.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
SAMMARRA & ROSTEM [2015] FamCA 358
Most Recent Citation
DONNE & DONNE [2018] FCCA 2887
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
2
Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim
[2012] NSWCCA 125
Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim
[2012] NSWCCA 125
Hogan v Australian Crime Commission
[2010] HCA 21