Sammarra and Rostem (No 2)

In the matter of *Sammarra and Rostem (No 2)*, Hogan J of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia considered an application by the Respondent for an order that the Applicant pay his costs of and incidental to a Case filed on 23 June 2014.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the Respondent was entitled to an order for costs against the Applicant in relation to the aforementioned Case.

Hogan J dismissed the Respondent's application for costs. The reasons for this dismissal are not elaborated upon in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the Court found no basis to award costs to the Respondent in this instance.