Salter and Salter and Ors
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 669
•31 August 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Salter and Salter and Ors [2018] FamCA 669
[2018] FamCA 669
31 August 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Salter and Salter*, Berman J considered an application and response concerning a dispute between the parties. The application was filed on 12 July 2018, and the response was filed on 13 August 2018. The court was tasked with determining the appropriate orders to be made in relation to the matters raised in these filings.
The court was required to determine which paragraphs of the parties' respective applications and responses should be upheld, dismissed, or subject to further conditions. This involved deciding on the scope of discovery and information exchange, including specific details regarding livestock identification, RFID purchases, and plant and equipment acquisitions for properties identified as Property D and Property B. The court also had to consider the valuation of certain assets.
Berman J made a series of orders, listing the application for hearing and making orders in terms of specific paragraphs of the response, subject to certain conditions such as claims of privilege. Several paragraphs of the response were dismissed. The court also ordered that each party provide the other with specific information, including National Livestock Identification passwords, schedules of RFID purchases, and schedules of plant and equipment purchases, with a proviso regarding the valuation process.
The court was required to determine which paragraphs of the parties' respective applications and responses should be upheld, dismissed, or subject to further conditions. This involved deciding on the scope of discovery and information exchange, including specific details regarding livestock identification, RFID purchases, and plant and equipment acquisitions for properties identified as Property D and Property B. The court also had to consider the valuation of certain assets.
Berman J made a series of orders, listing the application for hearing and making orders in terms of specific paragraphs of the response, subject to certain conditions such as claims of privilege. Several paragraphs of the response were dismissed. The court also ordered that each party provide the other with specific information, including National Livestock Identification passwords, schedules of RFID purchases, and schedules of plant and equipment purchases, with a proviso regarding the valuation process.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery
-
Injunction
-
Costs
-
Privilege
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0