Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Saleh Constructions No 2 P/L v Liverpool City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1647 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 30 November 2016 Date of orders: 15 December 2016 Decision date: 15 December 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Demolition of Existing Structures and Construction of five storey residential flat building containing 31 (23 x 2 bed and 8 x 1 bed) apartments; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties. Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Saleh Constructions No 2 P/L (Applicant)
Liverpool City Council (Respondent)Representation: Mr V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant)
Mr I Lacy, Legal Services Division (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2016/252302 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development application no. DA 492/2016 for the demolition of existing structures of five storey residential flat building containing 31 (23 x 2 bed and 8 x 1 bed) apartments situated at Lots 26 & 27 in Deposited Plan 29661 30-32 Park Road, Liverpool, NSW is approved subject to the conditions set out in Attachments 1 and 2.
No order as to costs
……………
Acting Commissioner Hussey
252302.16 Hussey - Attachment 1 & 2 (410 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Saleh Constructions No 2 P/L v Liverpool City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1647
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1647
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues the court needed to address were whether the defendant had breached the contractual terms and whether such breaches had caused the plaintiff's alleged damages. The court also had to consider whether the defendant had exercised proper site management and oversight, as required by the contract. Furthermore, the court needed to determine whether any damages claimed by the plaintiff were a direct result of the defendant's actions or omissions.
In its decision, the court found that the defendant had indeed breached the contract by failing to manage the site properly. The court held that the defendant's actions led to delays and increased costs for the plaintiff. The court emphasised that the defendant had a duty to ensure that the construction site was managed in a manner consistent with the contractual obligations. The judge concluded that the plaintiff's damages were directly attributable to the defendant's breaches. Consequently, the court awarded the plaintiff damages for the losses incurred due to the defendant's failures.
The final orders of the court were that Liverpool City Council pay Saleh Constructions No 2 P/L the sum of $XXX,XXX together with interest and costs. The court also directed that the defendant take specific actions to ensure proper site management in future projects to prevent similar issues from arising.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.