Salah and Solh (No.4)
Case
•
[2018] FCCA 2843
•5 October 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Salah and Solh (No.4) [2018] FCCA 2843
[2018] FCCA 2843
5 October 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Salah and Solh (No.4)*, heard by Judge Williams, the dispute concerned the setting aside of orders made by Her Honour Judge Jones on 11 September 2014, and the subsequent costs orders.
The court was required to determine whether the previous orders of Judge Jones should be set aside and to make consequential orders regarding the adjournment of proceedings and the fixation and offsetting of costs.
Judge Williams reasoned that the orders of 11 September 2014 should be set aside. The court further ordered that the proceedings be adjourned to the Duty List on a date to be advised. The wife's costs of 6 February 2018 were fixed at $4,000, and this amount was to be offset against the husband's costs order of 17 August 2018, which also amounted to $4,000, effectively cancelling out the respective cost obligations.
The court was required to determine whether the previous orders of Judge Jones should be set aside and to make consequential orders regarding the adjournment of proceedings and the fixation and offsetting of costs.
Judge Williams reasoned that the orders of 11 September 2014 should be set aside. The court further ordered that the proceedings be adjourned to the Duty List on a date to be advised. The wife's costs of 6 February 2018 were fixed at $4,000, and this amount was to be offset against the husband's costs order of 17 August 2018, which also amounted to $4,000, effectively cancelling out the respective cost obligations.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Equity & Trusts
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Salah and Solh (No.4) [2018] FCCA 2843
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Bell & Nahos
[2016] FamCAFC 244
Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon
[2003] HCA 48
Whisprun Pty Ltd v Dixon
[2003] HCA 48