Saks & Company v Ebru Sak
Case
•
[2012] ATMO 32
•30 March 2012
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Saks & Company v Ebru Sak [2012] ATMO 32
[2012] ATMO 32
30 March 2012
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In this matter before Bianca Irgang, the dispute concerned a trade mark application, number 1287716, filed by Ebru Sak. Saks & Company acted as the opponent in the proceedings. The core of the disagreement revolved around the grounds of opposition raised by Saks & Company against the registration of Ebru Sak's trade mark.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the opponent, Saks & Company, had discharged the onus of proof required to establish its grounds of opposition under section 60 of the relevant Act. This section pertains to the grounds upon which a trade mark application can be opposed.
The court found that Saks & Company had successfully met the onus placed upon it concerning the grounds of opposition argued during the hearing. Consequently, the court refused to register the trade mark application. Applying the general principle that costs follow the event, the court awarded costs against the applicant, Ebru Sak, to be assessed according to the official scale in Schedule 8 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995.
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the opponent, Saks & Company, had discharged the onus of proof required to establish its grounds of opposition under section 60 of the relevant Act. This section pertains to the grounds upon which a trade mark application can be opposed.
The court found that Saks & Company had successfully met the onus placed upon it concerning the grounds of opposition argued during the hearing. Consequently, the court refused to register the trade mark application. Applying the general principle that costs follow the event, the court awarded costs against the applicant, Ebru Sak, to be assessed according to the official scale in Schedule 8 of the Trade Marks Regulations 1995.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Saks & Company v Ebru Sak [2012] ATMO 32
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
10
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Chocolaterie Guylian N.V. v Registrar of Trade Marks
[2009] FCA 891
Sports Warehouse, Inc v Fry Consulting Pty Ltd
[2010] FCA 664