Saje v Union for Progressive Judaism Inc. and Ors (No.2)

In *Saje v Union for Progressive Judaism Inc. and Ors (No.2)*, the applicant, Saje, was in dispute with the respondents, Union for Progressive Judaism Inc. and others. The proceedings were before Judge Street. The respondents sought leave to file an amended points of defence and also sought the production of un-redacted documents from the applicant.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the respondents should be granted leave to amend their defence and whether they should be permitted to obtain un-redacted documents from the applicant. These applications were made in a case that was otherwise dismissed.

Judge Street granted the respondents leave to rely upon their amended points of defence. The court's reasoning and the specific legal principles applied in granting this leave, and in relation to the production of documents, are not detailed in the provided text, beyond noting that the application was made in a case that had already been dismissed.

The final orders made by the court were that leave was granted to the respondents to rely upon their amended points of defence.