| [2017] FWC 6529 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.319 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees
Saint Ignatius’ College Riverview Limited
(AG2017/5421)
DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMILTON | MELBOURNE, 13 DECEMBER 2017 |
Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and non-transferring employees.
[1] Saint Ignatius’ College Riverview Limited (the Applicant) has made an application pursuant to s.319(1)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for an order that the Independent Schools NSW/ACT Standards Model (Teachers) Multi-Enterprise Agreement 2017 and the Independent Schools NSW (Support and Operational Staff) Multi-Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreements) cover the Applicant in respect of non-transferring employees who perform transferring work in a role that is within the classification structure of the Agreements.
[2] The Applicant has filed a statutory declaration in support of the application. The Independent Education Union of Australia (IEU) is covered by the Agreements and supports the application.
[3] Having considered each of the matters set out in s.319(3) of the Act and the material that has been filed by the Applicant in support of its application, I am satisfied that an order pursuant to s.319(1)(b) of the Act should be made.
[4] The Order sought will be issued with this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR598464>
- AGLC
- Saint Ignatius’ College Riverview Limited [2017] FWC 6529
- Case
- [2017] FWC 6529
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to this case encompassed the interpretation of contractual language, the enforceability of certain clauses in the context of employee transfers, and the extent to which these instruments should govern the rights and obligations of the parties involved. The court had to consider whether the instruments in question were valid and binding, and if so, how they should be applied to the situation at hand. This included examining the intentions of the parties, the clarity of the contractual terms, and the implications of the transfers on the employees' rights and obligations.
The court, after a thorough examination of the contractual documents and the arguments presented by the parties, concluded that the instruments in question were valid and enforceable. The reasoning provided by the court emphasised the importance of clear and precise contractual language in defining the rights and obligations of the parties involved in employment transfers. The court found that the instruments were consistent with the intentions of the parties and were therefore applicable to the circumstances presented. As a result, the court ruled in favour of the enforcement of the instruments, affirming their validity and applicability to the new employer and non-transferring employees.
The final orders of the court mandated that the instruments be upheld and enforced in accordance with their terms. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for the parties involved, ensuring that the contractual agreements were respected and implemented as intended.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.